learning theory


How I Love Lucy was born? We decided that instead of divorce lawyers profiting from our mistakes, we’d profit from them.
Lucille Ball
 

Janice Dickinson, who British history mainly records as slightly less popular than Christopher Biggins, has said she sees herself as having been “shaped by my mistakes”. (We can’t find any interviews, but we’re sure that her plastic surgeons speak fondly of her in public too. Perhaps if she’d been in The Rocky Horror Show in her youth…?) Staying with the arts (and continuing the spirit of generosity), many musicians have spoken about their attitudes to mistakes. Miles Davis simply said “Do not fear mistakes. There are none”, while Ornette Coleman’s approach was perhaps a little more humble:

It was when I found out I could make mistakes that I knew I was on to something.

Coleman’s imply one common view of mistakes – that they are an opportunity for learning from direct experience, a way of finding out both about whatever area of life you make the mistake in and about yourself. (Indeed, in another corner of the arts, James Joyce called mistakes “the portals of discovery”.) With mistakes, a lot comes down to how you view them – both in the abstract and in the aftermath.

(more…)

Are you getting your five a day? No, not fruit & veg. Not even superfruits. Emails. That little red light lighting up on your crac … sorry, BlackBerry to help you feel needed, wanted, useful: after all, if you’re on call 24/7, you’re somebody, right? Having been totally absorbed for the last few days, using both thumbs to navigate my way through Sherry Turkle’s Alone Together, I’m wondering if the question isn’t actually how much of a somebody you might be becoming, and what your Blackberry says about you – and your relationship not so much with technology, but with the rest of humanity.

(more…)

As people who like to think that the glass is at least half-full, we were always optimistic that we would meet our target on responses to Learning Transfer 2010 – the UK’s first nationwide survey of current practice in learning transfer and application. Having aimed at getting 500 responses by the end of 2010, our faith in human nature – and, more importantly, in the HR and L&D communities – was boosted when we made the final tally and realised that over 550 of you had taken the time to answer our online questionnaire.

Firstly, a big thank you to all of you that did so. We were conscious that, to ask enough questions to explore the topic meaningfully and with the depth it deserves, the questionnaire would take at least a few minutes of your time. We also consciously chose not to incentivise its completion beyond the knowledge that those that did would be helping to shed light on a crucially important topic in L&D and its impact on organisational performance. If professionally developing others is an expression faith in humanity, then that faith is contagious and we applaud it!

(more…)

This review should start with a confession. In the spirit of the one of the ‘Mottos to work by’ at Bully OnLine’s Bad boss jokes page – “Plagiarism saves time”, one of the messages from Bounce has already appears in this blog. When light-heartedly identifying Five Signs You Might Need A Coach, we included “You lack bottom (especially for landing on)”. The inspiration was an example in Syed’s book of the counter-intuitive importance of failure in achieving success, namely Shizuka Arakawa, Japanese figure skater, 2004 World Champion and 2006 Olympic Champion. The point – one of many that Syed makes through the example of sport, but making compelling and interesting challenges to the notion that talent is somehow ‘innate’ – is that effective purposeful practice must embrace failure. To extend our abilities, we must try things we’re not currently capable of, and accept that we may not necessarily succeed at first. Or, to quote the book:

Author Geoff Colvin has estimated that Shizuka Arakawa {…} tumbled over more than twenty thousand times in her progression from five-year old wannabe to 2006 Olympic champion. ‘Arakawa’s story is invaluable as a metaphor,’ Colvin has written. ‘Landing on your butt twenty thousand times is where great performance comes from.’”

(more…)

Over the past decade many international development agencies have broadened their activity portfolios… focusing increasingly on capacity development and knowledge sharing… Reflecting a complementary development, academic institutes… are progressively including stakeholders such as policy makers and practitioners in the process of knowledge generation… Despite this convergence of focus between development research and practice, a wide gap still exists: knowledge transfer between the two is limited… Many efforts to bridge this gap have been initiated; almost as many have failed.” (Ferguson, 2005)

‘Hark! Is that a gauntlet I hear being cast down?’

Well, having never been the sort to back out of a challenge, we’ve thrown our lot in with the folk down at Training Journal and assisted them in the creation of Learning Transfer 2010. For those of you that aren’t familiar with the survey, think of this as a brief induction session.

(more…)

It may seem a little slow off the mark to review a book first published in 2008 (and revised in 2009), but Nudge is a book that has been heavily commented on in the national press in recent weeks, partly because of the authors’ influence on the Obama administration but primarily as the book has reputedly been heavily influential on our own Prime Minister’s thinking.  I confess the one word title made me suspicious – mainly that this would be one of those ‘here’s the answer to everything … well, if you over-simplify it enough’ books. (One of these days, I am tempted to write a book called Shrug, not just to make my indifference clear but to attempt to profit from it.)

It seems fair to say that Nudge will, certainly in time, be seen as a highly influential text: the book’s ‘behavioural economics’ approach to modern life and the human condition has already influenced the US statute book. To give fair warning to UK-based readers, however, the authors’ interest in the human condition and human behavioural traits and patterns does not necessarily make their work a universal one. As recent reviews of Tony Blair’s A Journey have shown, books can reveal things about their authors that aren’t always what was intended.

(more…)

Just the one cracker, but a timely one (if you’re reading promptly), and an interested debate on the nature – and nurture – of talent. (Don’t Compromise will be reviewing Daniel Coyle’s book, The Talent Code, shortly. Follow us on Twitter to keep in touch with the latest posts.)

Eureka fight club live: Is talent taught rather than innate? The Times website hosts a live debate at 3pm today between Daniel Coyle, author of The Talent Code, who believes the role of genes has been overstated, andEllen Winner, professor of psychology at Boston College, who argues that while hard work is a necessary condition for high achievement, it is not sufficient: success also depends on natural aptitude.

Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Furl | Newsvine

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

One of the challenges of any HR function is to be seen not as reactive, or dominated by a love of process and procedure (and of imposing them on other functions), but as a real player in the business that is there to deliver results. Even where HR functions have achieved this ‘modernisation’, the perception of the function elsewhere in the organisation may take some time to catch up and see this modified reality. Just as HR has a key role to play in developing the Employer Brand and the Employee Value Proposition (as we’ve discussed here, here and here), so it has the challenge of developing a learning brand that truly reflects – and projects – its real sense of its own purpose.

(more…)

« Previous PageNext Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers